Archbishop Tomasi reacts to UN report observations
(Vatican Radio) The United Nations has issued concluding observations on the reviewed
reports of the Holy See and five States , Parties to the Convention on the Rights
of the Child. It follows a hearing at the UN in Geneva attended by a group from Holy
See last month. Heading the Vatican delegation at those discussions was Archbishop
Silvano Tomasi, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations in Geneva.
He
gave his reaction to the report to Vatican Radio.
Q. What is the reaction of
the Holy See to these harsh criticisms by the UN contained in this report?
A.
The report in the concluding recommendations that the committee of the Convention
on the Right of the Child released today point out a rather negative approach to what
the Holy See has been doing — and has already achieved — in the area of the protection
of children.
The first impression is that the report in some ways is not up
to date, not taking into account some of the clear and precise explanations that were
given to the committee in the encounter that the delegation of the Holy See had with
the committee three or four weeks ago.
Second, I would say that there is a
difficulty apparent in understanding the position of the Holy See, that cannot certainly
give up certain teachings that are part of their deep convictions — and also an expression
of freedom of religion — and these are the values that in the tradition of the Catholic
Church sustain the common good of society and therefore cannot be renounced. For example,
the committee asked for acceptance of abortion, and this is a contradiction of the
principle of life that the convention itself should support, recommending that children
be protected before and after birth. If a child is eliminated or killed we can no
longer talk about rights for this person.
So there is a need to calmly and
in detail analyze the recommendations proposed by the committee and provide an accurate
response to the committee itself, so that there will be no misunderstanding on where
we stand and the reason why we take certain positions. And I would add that the practical
remedies for preventing cases of abuse of children in forms of laws or decisions of
Episcopal Conferences, of directives for the formation of seminarians, constitute
a package of measures that is very difficult, I think, to find in other institutions
or even other states that have done so much specifically for the protection of children.
So,
my sense is that we have to continue to refine, to enact provisions that protect children
in all their necessities so that they may grow and become productive adults in society
and their dignity be constantly respected. And at the same time we have to keep in
mind that even though there are so many millions, forty million cases of abuse a year
regarding children and unfortunately some cases affect also Church personnel.
We
have to keep in mind that we have to continue to combat this tragedy knowing that
even a [single] case of abuse of a child is a case too much.
Q. The United
Nations had said that the Holy See had responded better than other countries regarding
the safeguarding of children. What’s changed now?
A. The Holy See presented
its report as a state in this 65th session of the activity of the committee. The reports
of Germany, the Holy See, Congo, Portugal, Russian Federation and Yemen were examined.
The Holy See presented the concrete measures taken both at the level of the State
of Vatican City and of the Church at large, taking into account that priests are not
employees of the Pope but they are responsible citizens of the countries where they
work and therefore accountable to the judicial system of those countries.
The
effort made was to give an objective picture of the remedies undertaken, of the new
steps that still are in the making, [such as] the commission announced by the Holy
Father for the protection of minors, and without any comparison with other states.
We simply say we recognize there has been a small percentage of Church personnel that
have committed abuses and these are the steps taken to prevent that such abuses be
made again.
Maybe not all the observations in the facts have been adequately
taken into account in the conclusions, so that, for example, the principle that the
Holy See is accountable directly for the Vatican City State but not for other countries
where local jurisdiction [lies] in the state authorities — a responsibility [that]
should be implemented, and punish whoever, including priests, may have abused children.
So
that’s possibly an explanation but we need time to reflect carefully on the conclusions
and recommendations of the committee and to prepare an adequate response, so that
the objective may really be pursued.
The Holy See is a state party to the
Convention on the Rights of the Child and intends to be faithfully carrying out all
the elements of this Convention for the protection of children and this is the way
toward the future. And I don’t think that there will be fundamental changes in this
task ahead.
Listen to Lydia O’Kane’s interview with Archbishop Silvano
Tomasi: