Fr Federico Lombardi, Vatican Press Office Director, Editorial L'Osservatore Romano (09
Apr 10 - RV) The Head of the Press Office of the Holy See, Jesuit Fr. Federico Lombardi
has published an essay in the Vatican Newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, in which
he addressed the ongoing crisis of sexual abuse of minors:
"The crisis concerning
sexual abuse, and not only that committed by the clergy, continues with news items
and comments of various kinds. How can we navigate these stormy waters while maintaining
a secure course and responding to the evangelical motto 'Duc in altum - Put out into
the deep'?
In the first place, by continuing to seek truth, and peace for the
victims. One of the most striking things is that today so many inner wounds are coming
to light, wounds that also date back to many years (sometimes decades) ago, but evidently
still open, Many victims do not seek financial compensation but inner assistance,
a judgement on their painful individual experiences. There is something that we have
yet to fully understand; perhaps we need a more profound experience of events that
have had such a negative impact on the lives of individuals, of the Church and of
society. One example of this, at the collective level, is the hatred and violence
of conflicts between peoples which are, as we see, so difficult to overcome in true
reconciliation. Abuse opens wounds at a deep inner level. For this reason, certain
episcopates were right when they courageously resumed developing ways and places in
which victims could express themselves freely, listening to them without taking it
for granted that the problem had already been faced and overcome by the crisis centres
established sometime ago. For this reason also, other episcopates and individual bishops
were right to intervene with caring attention, showing spiritual, liturgical and human
concern for victims. It seems certain that the number of new accusations of abuse
is falling, as is happening in the United States, but for many people the road to
profound healing is only now beginning, and for others it has yet to start. In the
context of this concern for victims, the Pope has written of his readiness to hold
new meetings with them, thus sharing in the journey of the entire ecclesial community.
But this journey, in order to achieve profound effects, must take place in a climate
of respect for people and the search for peace.
Alongside concern for victims
we must continue to implement, decisively and truthfully, the correct procedures for
the canonical judgement of the guilty, and for collaborating with the civil authorities
in matters concerning their judicial and penal competencies, taking the specific norms
and situations of the various countries into account. Only in this way can we hope
effectively to rebuild a climate of justice and complete trust in the ecclesiastical
institution. It has happened that a number of leaders of communities and institutions,
through inexperience or lack of preparation, have not had a ready understanding of
the protocols and criteria for intervention which could have helped them intervene
decisively even when this was very difficult or painful for them. But, while civil
law intervenes through general norms, canon law must take account of the specific
moral gravity of an abuse of the trust placed in persons who hold positions of responsibility
within the ecclesial community, and of the flagrant contradiction with the conduct
they should show. In this sense, transparency and rigour are urgent requirements for
wise and just government within the Church.
The formation and selection of
candidates for the priesthood, and more generally of the staff of educational and
pastoral institutions, is the basis for an effective prevention of the risk of future
abuses. Achieving a healthy maturity of the personality, also from a sexual point
of view, has always been a difficult challenge, but today it is particularly so, although
the best psychological and medical knowledge is of great help in spiritual and moral
formation. It has been observed that the greatest frequency of abuses coincided with
the most intense period of the 'sexual revolution' of past decades. Formation must
take account of this context and of the more general context of secularisation. In
the final analysis, this means rediscovering and reaffirming the meaning and importance
of sexuality, chastity and emotional relationships in today's world, and doing so
in concrete, not just verbal or abstract, terms. What a source of disorder and suffering
their violation or undervaluation can be! As the Pope observed in his Letter to Irish
Catholics, a Christian priestly life today can respond to the requirements of its
vocation only by truly nourishing itself at the wellspring of faith and friendship
with Christ.
People who love truth and the objective evaluation of problems
will know where to seek and find information for a more overall comprehension of the
problem of paedophilia and the sexual abuse of minors in our time, in different countries,
understanding its range and pervasiveness. Thus they will be able to achieve a better
understanding of the degree to which the Catholic Church shares problems that are
not only her own, to what extent they have particular gravity for her and require
specific interventions, and, finally, the extent to which the experience the Church
is going through in this field may also be useful for other institutions or for society
as a whole. In this context, we truly feel that the communications media have not
yet worked sufficiently, especially in countries in which the Church has a stronger
presence and in which she is more easily subject to criticism. Yet, documents such
as the national US report on the mistreatment of children deserve to be better known
in order to understand what fields require urgent social intervention, and the proportions
of the problem. In the U.S.A. in 2008 alone, 62,000 people were identified as having
committed acts of abuse against minors, while the proportion of Catholic priests was
so small as not to be taken into consideration as a group.
The protection
of minors and young people is, then, an immense and unlimited field, which goes well
beyond the specific problem concerning certain members of the clergy. People who sensitively,
generously and attentively dedicate their efforts to this problem deserve gratitude,
respect and encouragement from everyone, especially from the ecclesial and civil authorities.
Theirs is an essential contribution for the serenity and credibility of the education
and formation of young people, both inside and outside the Church. The Pope rightly
expressed words of great appreciation for them in his Letter to Irish Catholics, though
naturally with a view to a vaster horizon.
Finally, Pope Benedict XVI, a
coherent guide along the path of rigour and truth, merits all respect and support,
testimony of which is reaching him from all parts of the Church. He is a pastor well
capable of facing - with great rectitude and confidence - this difficult time in which
there is no lack of criticism and unfounded insinuations. It must be said that he
is a Pope who has spoken a lot about the Truth of God and about respect for truth;
and he has become a credible witness of this. We accompany him, learning from him
the constancy necessary to grow in truth and transparency, continuing to open our
horizons to the serious problems of the world and responding patiently to the slow
and gradual release of partial or presumed 'revelations' which seek to undermine his
credibility, and that of other institutions or individuals of the Church.
This patient and solid love of truth is necessary, in the Church, in the society in
which we live, in communicating and in writing, if we wish to serve rather than confuse
our fellow men and women".
Mueller case (07 Apr 10 - RV) In response to questions from reporters about the case of the
former bishop of Trondheim, Monsignor Georg Mueller, the Director of the Holy See
Press Office, Fr Federico Lombardi S.J., issued the following statement:
I
confirm the information given in the press statement released by the Apostolic Administrator
of Trondheim (Norway), Bishop Bernd Eidsvig regarding the former bishop of Trondheim,
Mgr Georg Mueller, Bishop of the Diocese from 1997 to 2009.
The story concerns
a case of sexual abuse of a child in the early 1990’s, which came to the attention
of church authorities in January 2009. The issue was addressed and dealt with promptly
through the Stockholm Nunciature, by mandate of the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith. In May 2009, the Bishop offered his resignation which was promptly accepted
by the Holy Father, and in June left the diocese. He underwent a period of therapy
and no longer carries out pastoral activities. From the standpoint of civil law the
case fell into prescription. The victim, now an adult, has so far always asked to
remain anonymous.
Teta case: (03 Apr 10 - RV) Vatican Press
Office Director, Fr Federico Lombardi, has issued a statement regarding recent media
reports on the case of Rev. Michael Teta of the Diocese of Tucson Arizona.
In
the statement Fr Lombardi notes “some newspapers have recently reported on the "Teta
case", of abuse by a priest of the Diocese of Tucson in the 1970's. Much of the reportage
has been misleading”.
He writes “The Diocese of Tucson contacted the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith regarding the case, because it regarded the canonical
crime of solicitation in the confessional. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith took an active interest in the case throughout the 1990’s, in order to guarantee
that the Church trial underway in the Diocese of Tucson was properly completed. The
trial was completed in 1997. The cleric in question was found guilty and laicized.
The evidence clearly and certainly shows this. The Bishop of Tucson, Bishop Kicanas
had already stated as much in response to local press inquiries. Published letters
from the CDF confirm this”.
Fr Lombardo goes on to note that Fr. Teta,
however, presented an appeal. “His appeal reached the Congregation Tribunal during
a period in which the revision of the canonical norms previously in force had already
started. The appeals were therefore pending until the entry into force of new legislation
in 2001, which resulted in all cases of "serious crimes" being placed under the jurisdiction
of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith for a faster and more secure treatment”.
Murphy
case (25 Mar 10 – RV): The following is the full text of the statement given
to the New York Times on March 24, 2010:
The tragic case of Father Lawrence
Murphy, a priest of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, involved particularly vulnerable
victims who suffered terribly from what he did. By sexually abusing children who
were hearing-impaired, Father Murphy violated the law and, more importantly, the
sacred trust that his victims had placed in him.
During the mid-1970s,
some of Father Murphy’s victims reported his abuse to civil authorities, who investigated
him at that time; however, according to news reports, that investigation was dropped.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was not informed ofthe matter until
some twenty years later.
It has been suggested that a relationship exists
between the application of Crimen sollicitationis and the non-reporting of child
abuse to civil authorities in this case. In fact, thereis no such relationship. Indeed,
contrary to some statements that have circulated in the press,neither Crimen nor the
Code of Canon Law ever prohibited the reporting of child abuse to law enforcement
authorities.
In the late 1990s, after over two decades had passed since
the abuse had been reported to diocesan officials and the police, the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith was presented for the first time with the question of
how to treat the Murphy case canonically.
The Congregation was informed
of the matter because it involved solicitation in the confessional, which is a violation
of the Sacrament of Penance. It is important to note that the canonical question presented
to the Congregation was unrelated to any potential civil or criminal proceedings against
Father Murphy.
In such cases, the Code of Canon Law does not envision automatic
penalties, but recommends that a judgment be made not excluding even the greatest
ecclesiastical penalty of dismissal from the clerical state (cf. Canon 1395, no. 2).
In light of the facts that Father Murphy was elderly and in very poor health, and
that he was living in seclusion and no allegations of abuse had been reported in over
20 years, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith suggested that the Archbishop
of Milwaukee give consideration to addressing the situation by, for example, restricting
Father Murphy’s public ministry and requiring that Father Murphy accept full responsibility
for the gravity of his acts. Father Murphy died approximately four months later, without
further incident.