Ireland: Card. Seán Brady responds to BBC ‘This World’ Programme
Responding to the BBC ‘This World’ programme entitled ‘The Shame of the Catholic
Church’, broadcast on 1 May 2012, Cardinal Seán Brady [Archbishop of Armagh Ireland]
has issued the following statement:
On Tuesday 1 May 2012, the BBC
‘This World’ series broadcast a programme entitled ‘The Shame of the Catholic Church’
on the BBC Northern Ireland network. In the course of the programme a number of claims
were made which overstate and seriously misrepresent my role in a Church Inquiry in
1975 into allegations against the Norbertine priest Fr Brendan Smyth.
In response
to the programme I wish to draw attention to the following:
Six weeks before
broadcast (15 March 2012) I drew the attention of the programme makers to a number
of important facts related to the 1975 Church inquiry into Brendan Smyth, which the
programme failed to report and which I now wish to restate for all other media who
report on this matter:
To suggest, as the programme does, that
I led the investigation of the 1975 Church Inquiry into allegations against Brendan
Smyth is seriously misleading and untrue. I was asked by my then Bishop (Bishop Francis
McKiernan of the Diocese of Kilmore) to assist others who were more senior to me in
this Inquiry process on a one-off basis only; The documentation of the interview
with Brendan Boland, signed in his presence, clearly identifies me as the ‘notary’
or ‘note taker’. Any suggestion that I was other than a ‘notary’ in the process of
recording evidence from Mr Boland, is false and misleading; I did not formulate
the questions asked in the Inquiry process. I did not put these questions to Mr Boland.
I simply recorded the answers that he gave; Acting promptly and with the specific
purpose of corroborating the evidence provided by Mr Boland, thereby strengthening
the case against Brendan Smyth, I subsequently interviewed one of the children identified
by Mr Boland who lived in my home diocese of Kilmore. That I conducted this interview
on my own is already on the public record. This provided prompt corroboration of the
evidence given by Mr Boland; In 1975 no State or Church guidelines existed in the
Republic of Ireland to assist those responding to an allegation of abuse against a
minor. No training was given to priests, teachers, police officers or others who worked
regularly with children about how to respond appropriately should such allegations
be made; Even according to the State guidelines in place in the Republic of Ireland
today, the person who first receives and records the details of an allegation of child
abuse in an organisation that works with children is not the person who has responsibility
within that organisation for reporting the matter to the civil authorities. This responsibility
belongs to the ‘Designated person’ appointed by the organisation and trained to assume
that role. In 1975, I would not have been the ‘Designated Person’ according to today’s
guidelines. As the Children First State guidelines explain (3.3.1):‘Every
organisation, both public and private, that is providing services for children or
that is in regular direct contact with children should (i) Identify a designated liaison
person to act as a liaison with outside agencies and a resource person to any staff
member or volunteer who has child protection concerns.(ii) The designated liaison
person is responsible for ensuring that the standard reporting procedure is followed,
so that suspected cases of child neglect or abuse are referred promptly to the designated
person in the HSE Children and Family Services or in the event of an emergency and
the unavailability of the HSE, to An Garda Síochána.’; The commentary in the
programme and much of the coverage of my role in this Inquiry gives the impression
that I was the only person who knew of the allegations against Brendan Smyth at that
time and that because of the office I hold in the Church today I somehow had the power
to stop Brendan Smyth in 1975. I had absolutely no authority over Brendan Smyth. Even
my Bishop had limited authority over him. The only people who had authority within
the Church to stop Brendan Smyth from having contact with children were his Abbot
in the Monastery in Kilnacrott and his Religious Superiors in the Norbertine Order.
As Monsignor Charles Scicluna, Promoter of Justice at the Congregation for the Doctrine
of the Faith confirmed in an interview with RTÉ this morning, it was Brendan Smyth’s
superiors in the Norbertine Order who bear primary responsibility for failing to take
the appropriate action when presented with the weight of evidence I had faithfully
recorded and that Bishop McKiernan subsequently presented to them; The following
statement from Monsignor Scicluna had been made to the BBC programme makers six weeks
in advance of its broadcast but was not acknowledged by them in any way: ‘It is
clear to me that in 1975 Fr Brady, now Cardinal Brady, acted promptly and with determination
to ensure the allegations being made by the children were believed and acted upon
by his superiors. His actions were fully consistent with his duties under canon law.
But the power to act effectively to remove Brendan Smyth from priestly ministry lay
exclusively with the Abbot of Holy Trinity Abbey in Kilnacrott and his superiors in
the Norbertine Order. This is where the sincere efforts of Bishop McKiernan and others
like Fr Brady to prevent Brendan Smyth from perpetrating further harm were frustrated,
with tragic consequences for the lives of so many children. I know that in his role
as President of the Irish Bishops’ Conference, Cardinal Brady has worked tirelessly
with his fellow bishops to ensure such a situation could never occur again and that
the civil authorities in Ireland are now promptly informed of allegations of abuse
against children. We have all learned from the tragic experience of the Church in
Ireland but also from the sincere efforts of so many lay faithful, religious, priests
and bishops to make the Church in Ireland an example of best practice in safeguarding
children.’; In fact, I was shocked, appalled and outraged when I first discovered
in the mid 1990’s that Brendan Smyth had gone on to abuse others. I assumed and trusted
that when Bishop McKiernan brought the evidence to the Abbot of Kilnacrott that the
Abbot would then have dealt decisively with Brendan Smyth and prevented him from abusing
others. With others, I feel betrayed that those who had the authority in the Church
to stop Brendan Smyth failed to act on the evidence I gave them. However, I also accept
that I was part of an unhelpful culture of deference and silence in society, and the
Church, which thankfully is now a thing of the past; As to other children named
in the evidence recorded during the Inquiry process, I had no further involvement
in the Inquiry process once I handed over the evidence taken. I trusted that those
with the authority to act in relation to Brendan Smyth would treat the evidence seriously
and respond appropriately. I had no such authority to act and even by today’s guidance
from the State I was not the person who had the role of bringing the allegations received
to the attention of the civil authorities. I was also acutely aware that I had no
authority in Church law in relation to Brendan Smyth or any other aspect of the Inquiry
process; Today, Church policy in Ireland is to report allegations of abuse to
the civil authorities. It recognises the Gardai and HSE as those with responsibility
for investigating such allegations and that any Church investigation should not take
place until the investigation by the civil authorities has been completed. I have
fully supported this policy and have worked with my fellow Bishops and the leaders
of Religious Congregations to put this policy in place; The programme made reference
to a statement I made in the course of an RTE interview in which I suggested that
if my failure to act on an allegation of abuse against a child led to further children
being abused, that I would then consider resigning from my position. The programme
failed to point out, however, that I gave this answer in response to a question specifically
about someone in a position of ‘Management’, someone who was already a Bishop or Religious
Superior with ultimate responsibility for managing a priest against whom an allegation
has been made. In 1975, I was not a Bishop. I was not in that role. It was misleading
of the BBC programme to apply my response to the RTE interview on a completely different
situation to my role in the 1975 Inquiry.
It is my view that the ‘This
World’ programme has set out to deliberately exaggerate and misrepresent my role in
these events. The programme suggested that no response to their questions had been
provided before the programme was completed, whereas in fact a comprehensive response
had been provided to the programme six weeks in advance and only days after the ‘door-stepping’
interview with me in Limerick.
I deeply regret that those with the authority
and responsibility to deal appropriately with Brendan Smyth failed to do so, with
tragic and painful consequences for those children he so cruelly abused. I also deeply
regret that no guidelines from the State or the Church were available to guide the
sincere and serious effort made to respond to the allegations made by the two boys
interviewed in the Inquiry process. With many others who worked regularly with children
in 1975, I regret that our understanding of the full impact of abuse on the lives
of children as well as the pathology and on-going risk posed by a determined paedophile
was so inadequate. It is important to acknowledge that today both the Church and the
State have proper and robust procedures in place to respond to allegations of abuse
against children. I fully support these new procedures which include the obligation
to report such allegations promptly to the civil authorities. I have worked with others
in the Church to put these new procedures in place and I look forward to continuing
that vital work in the years ahead.